Pre-structured Settlement Loans for Auto Accident Victims

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

If u were involved in an auto accident and injured you may be considering or be in the middle of a lawsuit; against the person, a company or insurance provider. These types of lawsuits can take many months if not years to complete. Unless the victim choose a settlement, which usually is much lower than what is deserved. Regardless if you ride the case till the end or accept a settlement you’ll most likely be stuck with a structured settlement.

A structured settlement is basically an alternative to a large one sum payment. A pre determined amount of money is awarded to the victim and to be paid out at specific amounts over so many months or every year. This can help protect the company or person making those payments from financial ruins. However, it can add a financial burden to the victim since they cannot access all of the money at once. Resulting in negative reports on your credit history; lose of house or auto and even bankruptcy.

There are a few solutions the victim can opt for; one would be what’s called a settlement loan or pre-settlement loan. This is where the victim would actually apply for a settlement loan with a settlement loan provider in the middle of the lawsuit. They can receive money ahead of the verdict and use the cash as needed. This can be much more useful than a traditional loan since if your case is lost you don’t need to pay back the advance that was given.

Another solution would be to sell your structured settlement. This is where a company or investor would buy out your payments for one large payment. You wouldn’t receive the full amount of your structured settlement, you’ll get around 75% to 80% at best. This is a good solution if you need money now to pay off bills. However, you can only sell your structured settlement after an agreement has been made in court. If you still have a pending lawsuit you’ll have to opt for a settlement loan.

So, if you’re an auto accident victim and need cash now you just need to weight your options. You’ll be able to do one of two things; if you’re in the middle of a pending lawsuit you can apply for a pre-settlement loan. If you have a structured settlement you can opt to sell it to a 3rd party provider for a large one sum payment. Whatever you choose discuss your options with a financial advisor prior to accepting any agreements.
READ MORE - Pre-structured Settlement Loans for Auto Accident Victims

Downside of Structured Settlement Loans

Structured settlements are a way for a person, company or insurance provider to pay out awards won in a lawsuit over a period of time. This is usually done on a bi-monthly or yearly schedule. This prevents large losses due to the results of a lawsuit again that person, company or insurance provider.

If you do have a structured settlement you can opt to get a large sum payment; this is called a settlement loan. This is when a provider buys out your remaining structured settlement payments for one large sum. You can also get pre-settlement loans before a lawsuit case has even reached a verdict. You should know the disadvantages before deciding if it's right for you.

The main downside is taxes. The money that you would receive from the provider is considered taxable. You would have to pay applicable taxes at the current state and federal rate for that calendar year. You'll also be responsible for self employment tax; this is the tax self employed individuals pay since they are not getting social security and Medicare withheld from their income. You should be aware of all tax responsibilities behind your settlement loan before making any decisions. I'd suggest speaking with a financial adviser that has worked with settlement loans in the past.

Another downside is the loss of money in your total structured settlement. The settlement loan provider will get a portion of the total amount owed over the structured settlements duration. This is different between settlement loan providers and private settlement loan investors. Usually, you can expect them to absorb 20% to 40% of the value of the entire structured settlement or on top of the settlement loan itself. You should make sure it's worth the cost before taking it out in the first place.

Reviewing this few disadvantages of a structured settlement loan it should be noted there are many advantages. First, if you're getting a pre-settlement loan you're not responsible to pay the loan back if you lose your case. Second, if your structured settlement is bought out to protect assets such as a car or home it can out weight the costs of the loan itself. Either way, neither of them require any specific income or credit history; making these available to anyone with a pending lawsuit or structured settlement.
READ MORE - Downside of Structured Settlement Loans

Pre-structured Settlement Loans for Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice lawsuits are one of the most common lawsuit types in the United States of America. They also tend to be one of the longest lawsuits when it comes to trials. This is the main reason why most medical malpractice suits end up in a settlement agreement; which in turn results in a structured settlement. Many people don’t realize they have an option in a medical malpractice suit to obtain funds. If you’re currently in the middle of a pending medical malpractice lawsuit you can obtain a settlement loan instead of reaching an early settlement agreement; alternately if you’ve accepted a structured settlement plan you can receive a large sum payment.

A settlement loan is an excellent choice if your medical malpractice lawsuit is still pending. It allows you to receive a cash advance based on the merit and probability of winning your current suit. It allows you not only to pay any pending medical bills, it allows you to let your case’s trial go on till the end and not settlement for a lower amount that is rightfully due to you. In case you lose your lawsuit you don’t have to worry. You are not required to pay back the settlement loan if the case is lost! This makes a settlement loan a priority over a traditional loan in this case.

A structured settlement buyout is an excellent choice if you’ve settled your malpractice lawsuit or the trial has ended in a verdict of your choice. A structured settlement buyout is basically a company or investor giving you a large one sum payment in return for your structured settlement payments. This is usually around 60% to 70% of the actual structured settlement amount. This is a great choice for anyone who needs cash now to take care of financial issues or to perhaps buy a new home.

Either way, a settlement loan or a structured settlement buyout is an excellent way for someone to get access to the financial funds they need for any given situation. They are better alternatives than traditional loans since you’ll be stuck making monthly payments with interest on top of them. Consult with a financial advisor prior to accepting any agreements, whether it be a settlement loan or a structured settlement buyout.
READ MORE - Pre-structured Settlement Loans for Medical Malpractice

Legal Structure

The typical structured settlement arises and is structured as follows:

An injured party (the claimant) settles a tort suit with the defendant (or its insurance carrier) pursuant to a settlement agreement that provides that, in exchange for the claimant's securing the dismissal of the lawsuit, the defendant (or, more commonly, its insurer) agrees to make a series of periodic payments over time.

The insurer, a property/casualty insurance company, thus finds itself with a long-term payment obligation to the claimant. To fund this obligation, the property/casualty insurer generally takes one of two typical approaches: It either purchases an annuity from a life insurance company (an arrangement called a "buy and hold" case) or it assigns (or, more properly, delegates) its periodic payment obligation to a third party which in turn purchases an annuity (which arrangement is called an "assigned case").

In an unassigned case, the property/casualty insurer retains the periodic payment obligation and funds it by purchasing an annuity from a life insurance company, thereby offsetting its obligation with a matching asset. The payment stream purchased under the annuity matches exactly, in timing and amounts, the periodic payments agreed to in the settlement agreement. The property/casualty company owns the annuity and names the claimant as the payee under the annuity, thereby directing the annuity issuer to send payments directly to the claimant. If any of the periodic payments are life-contingent (i.e., the obligation to make a payment is contingent on someone continuing to be alive), then the claimant (or whoever is determined to be the measuring life) is named as the annuitant or measuring life under the annuity.

In an assigned case, the property/casualty company does not wish to retain the long-term periodic payment obligation on its books. Accordingly, the property/casualty insurer transfers the obligation, through a legal device called a qualified assignment, to a third party. The third party, called an assignment company, will require the property/casualty company to pay it an amount sufficient to enable it to buy an annuity that will fund its newly accepted periodic payment obligation. If the claimant consents to the transfer of the periodic payment obligation (either in the settlement agreement or, failing that, in a special form of qualified assignment known as a qualified assignment and release), the defendant and/or its property/casualty company has no further liability to make the periodic payments. This method of substituting the obligor is desirable for property/casualty companies that do not want to retain the periodic payment obligation on their books. Typically, an assignment company is an affiliate of the life insurance company from which the annuity is purchased.

An assignment is said to be "qualified" if it satisfies the criteria set forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 130 [1]. Qualification of the assignment is important to assignment companies because without it the amount they receive to induce them to accept periodic payment obligations would be considered income for federal income tax purposes. If an assignment qualifies under Section 130, however, the amount received is excluded from the income of the assignment company. This provision of the tax code was enacted to encourage assigned cases; without it, assignment companies would owe federal income taxes but would typically have no source from which to make the payments.
READ MORE - Legal Structure

Structured Settlements in the United States

“structured settlement”

for federal income taxation purposes, found in Internal Revenue Code Section 5891(c)(1) (26 U.S.C. § 5891(c)(1)), is an "arrangement" that meets the following requirements:

A structured settlement must be established by:

A suit or agreement for periodic payment of damages excludable from gross income under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(2) (26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2)); or

Agreement

An agreement for the periodic payment of compensation under any workers’ compensation law excludable under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(1) (26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(1)); and
The periodic payments must be of the character described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of Internal Revenue Code Section 130(c)(2) (26 U.S.C. § 130(c)(2))) and must be payable by a person who:

Is a party to the suit or agreement or to a workers' compensation claim; or
By a person who has assumed the liability for such periodic payments under a qualified assignment in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 130 (26 U.S.C. § 130).

Fedral And State Levels

The United States has enacted structured settlement laws and regulations at both the federal and state levels. Federal structured settlement laws include sections of the (federal) Internal Revenue Code[1]. State structured settlement laws include structured settlement protection statutes and periodic payment of judgment statutes. Medicaid and Medicare laws and regulations affect structured settlements. To preserve a claimant’s Medicare and Medicaid benefits, structured settlement payments may be incorporated into “Medicare Set Aside Arrangements” “Special Needs Trusts."

Endrosement

Structured settlements have been endorsed by many of the nation's largest disability rights organizations, including the American Association of People with Disabilities [2] and the National Organization on Disability [3].
READ MORE - Structured Settlements in the United States

Definition

A structured settlement

is a financial or insurance arrangement, including periodic payments, that a claimant accepts to resolve a personal injury tort claim or to compromise a statutory periodic payment obligation.

First Utilization

Structured settlements were first utilized in Canada and the United States during the 1970s as an alternative to lump sum settlements.

Part Of Common Law

Structured settlements are now part of the statutory tort law of several common law countries including Australia, Canada, England and the United States. Although some uniformity exists, each of these countries has its own definitions, rules and standards for structured settlements.

Inclusion

Structured settlements may include income tax and spendthrift requirements as well as benefits. Structured settlement payments are sometimes called “periodic payments.” A structured settlement incorporated into a trial judgment is called a “periodic payment judgment."
READ MORE - Definition

Swiss Army Watches

Tuesday, February 17, 2009
















More about Swiss Army Watches










Victorinox is famous for the original Swiss Army Knife, created in 1897 in the small village of Ibach, Switzerland. Since that time, the company has become well-known in more than 100 countries for precision, quality, functionality and versatility.






























This century old heritage has been extended to Swiss Army Watches, which reflect the ingenious design and outstanding durability Victorinox has come to stand for over the years. Uncompromising craftsmanship makes these watches worthy to carry the 'cross and shield' emblem that symbolizes the legend of Victorinox and the Swiss Army Brand.




















Whether you're going around the corner or around the globe, classically styled Swiss Army watches will make sure that you're equipped for life's adventures. No matter what those adventures might be.
READ MORE - Swiss Army Watches

Swiss Army AirBoss Mach 5 GMT Mens Wristwatch



Item number:V25832
Brand:Swiss Army
Style Number:V25832
Series:AirBoss Mach 5 GMT
Style:Mens
Case:Stainless Steel
Dial Color:Black
Watch Bracelet / Strap:Leather - Black Cowhide
Movement:Automatic
Functions:Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Second Time Zone, Date
Crystal:Sapphire - Anti Reflective
Caseback:Sapphire Crystal - Transparent Exhibition Back
Bezel Material:Stainless Steel
Bezel Function:Fixed
Water Resistance:100m / 330ft (suitable for swimming and shallow snorkeling; unsuitable for diving)
Crown:Stainless Steel, Fluted
Calendar:Automatic Date at 3
Power Reserve:46-hour power reserve
READ MORE - Swiss Army AirBoss Mach 5 GMT Mens Wristwatch

 
 
 

Popular Posts

About Me